President Joe Biden is getting bad advice about inflation. It’s unclear if that advice is coming from political strategists or from economic advisers. Either way: It’s still bad.

The advice? That Biden should blame inflation on “corporate greed.”

By most measures, the economic recovery has been strong, thanks largely to expansionary fiscal and monetary policy. Unemployment is 3.9%, a rate that a mere year ago the Congressional Budget Office hadn’t expected the economy to reach until 2026. Output growth for 2021 also looks likely to exceed past forecasts. Stock markets are up more than 20% over the past year.

But one metric has been casting a shadow over all this sunshine: inflation.

Inflation has been higher, and persisted longer, than most economists predicted.

Instead of abating as the economy reopened, it recently hit its highest level in nearly four decades. Sharper price growth is due partly to COVID-related supply-chain problems, and partly to stronger demand as consumers spend cash they’ve amassed from lockdown-forced savings, appreciating assets and generous government transfers (stimulus payments, etc.).

Many of the same policies that enabled better-than-expected unemployment and gross domestic product have also led to worse-than-expected inflation numbers. High price growth is one downside of running the economy hot.

Democrats have struggled with how to message this mixed outcome.

Focusing on those many positives risks looking like they’re dismissing voters’ concerns about inflation (as some on the left had explicitly done for months). The administration wants to be seen as doing something about high prices. So, White House officials and other Democrats have pivoted their messaging toward some warmed-over populist talking points about how “corporate greed” is to blame.

Don’t worry, Dems now argue, the federal government will crack down on those profit-hungry jerks and force them to offer better prices!

As I’ve written before: This “corporate greed” narrative is nonsense. Corporations are always greedy. It’s their job to make a buck. They didn’t suddenly remember to become greedy in the past year. They’re charging higher prices, and booking higher profits, because that’s what happens when demand shoots up and supply is relatively constrained.

As is the case today.

To be sure, some industries are likely too concentrated, and uncompetitive, and might benefit from some sort of government intervention. One is the industry that Biden has made the poster child of his corporate-greed-focused anti-inflation efforts: meat processing. But it’s not clear his specific fix for that industry (loans and grants to tiny operators) would measurably reduce meat prices for consumers, particularly in the near term.

Even more far-fetched is the idea that these interventions would make any dent in overall inflation over the next few months. Recent inflation has been very broad-based — and meat and poultry represent only about 1% of total consumer spending.

Presumably, White House officials know this. They’re championing their supposedly anti-inflationary trustbusting agenda all the same. Maybe they think doing “something” about the meat industry is good policy no matter what, even if it’s orthogonal to inflation goals.

Or maybe political strategists have convinced them that blaming “greedy corporations” for inflation is popular. One Democratic pollster told The Washington Post that it advised the White House: “You need a villain or an explanation for this. If you don’t provide one, voters will fill one in. The right is providing an explanation, which is that you’re spending too much.”

Maybe populist demagoguing against “corporate greed” is effective for energizing progressive Twitter in the near term. But since it’s not an effective strategy for actually bringing down inflation, it could well backfire. Biden has publicly professed the ability to quash inflation through these measures; what happens if (when) inflation instead remains high?

The truth is that presidents have relatively limited tools for fighting inflation.

Biden has been reluctant to pull even those levers, such as lifting tariffs or accelerating the process for legal immigration. By law, in any case, it’s the Federal Reserve’s job to maintain stable prices.

Biden does have the ability to shape leadership at the Fed. He’s so far made one good choice, in renominating Jerome H. Powell as Fed chair. (Powell is respected by markets and has lately expressed more hawkishness about the inflation threat.) Biden has three other Fed board seats to fill though. Though names have been floated, he has dragged his feet on nominations — even though he’s a year into his presidency and the country faces its greatest inflation threat in a generation.

If Biden is truly worried about the threats posed by inflation, he will immediately nominate three professionals with a track record of political independence and a credible commitment to stabilizing prices. Markets need to trust that the Fed is willing to take the punchbowl away if necessary. Even during an election year.

Those Fed slots have gotten less attention than Biden’s performative attacks on corporate greed. But they’re the most important contribution Biden can make to getting inflation under control — and his political agenda back on track.

Catherine Rampell’s email address is crampell@washpost.com. Follow her on Twitter, @crampell.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.