On the weekend of Aug. 2, I joined nearly 2,000 of my fellow Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America and Students Demand Action volunteer leaders in Washington D.C. We were there to learn more about how to prevent gun violence in our communities. We were together when we learned about the tragedy in El Paso, and we woke up the next morning to the news about Dayton. And now, less than one month later, we have Midland and Odessa, Texas.
Once again gun violence has torn apart the lives of Americans. These families have become members of a club that no one wants to belong to: the millions of Americans whose lives have been forever changed by gun violence. This is more than mass shootings. In recent weeks, gun violence has devastated Baltimore, Gilroy, Brooklyn, Chicago and so many others.
The U.S. House of Representatives has already passed a bill that will require a background check on all gun sales. Now it is up to the Senate to pass this vital legislation along with a strong Red Flag bill. Although no single law can prevent all gun deaths, these common sense gun laws can prevent many of these types of tragedies, while still protecting the Second Amendment rights of responsible gun owners.
Let our legislators hear from you. Call Sens. Pat Toomey and Bob Casey and urge them to take action on background checks and a Red Flag law. Text CHECKS to 644-33.
• Mary Hegarty,
Volunteer for Pa. Chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America
Don’t ignore climate
Having attended the “Think About Energy Briefing” I was expecting an informative presentation on natural gas related “economic and environmental opportunities” as the agenda described.
However, there was too much family, comedic and anecdotal story telling about how wonderful things are with abundant natural gas and the low price of gasoline – that everyone in the room knew.
Give us facts and data and tell us something we do not know.
This was the first energy presentation that I attended without one graph or chart.
It was interesting to learn that the ratio of employees at a nuclear power plant is much higher than at a combined cycle natural gas power plant per megawatt of production.
It was also interesting to hear a natural gas executive oppose subsidies for any form of energy production.
However, many subsidies are often hidden at the front and back ends of energy production and the balance sheet.
A speaker said there was a recent and small decrease carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions but not where, when or whether any other variable(s) was involved or who documented it.
How can one think about, or discuss energy, today without one mention of “climate”?
Don’t ignore it.
How can we think about energy and natural gas with no mention of increasing methane emissions? Methane is a dangerous greenhouse gas that escapes from gas wells and pipelines.
Also, everything is not going well with the Mariner East natural gas pipeline. Any discussion should have included the delays, legal problems, lawsuits, spills, sinkholes, and fines from the Pa. Department of Protection (DEP) that have occurred.
Every energy presentation should include something on how we can improve our efficiency as consumers and how to reduce our energy consumption whether for economic, environmental, or social reasons.
Is there new technology that consumers can use?
How can we get a better price or group rate?
There is always safety information that everyone should know and be reminded about natural gas such as, “Call Before Your Dig”, using gas safely, and even how to identify an abandoned gas well when hiking or hunting in Pa. forests.
Give us something that we can use and tell us something that we don’t know.
And to US representative Fred Keller, you are not a cheerleader for the natural gas industry.
You represent all of us and you are our inside link to what is happening in Washington DC.
You could have given us a summary of recent federal energy legislation in Washington and how you voted and why on related legislation.
You could have given the group an update on a recent plan by the Trump administration to reduce regulations of methane emissions, a major contributor to climate change.
What is your position on this?
Next time, give us information and, in this case, energy and climate news, from Washington and updates on new and pending legislation that we might not know otherwise and why you support or oppose certain legislation or policy.
We expect more and deserve more.
The Standard Journal welcomes letters to the editor and encourages the use of this forum as a means of active community involvement.
Our goal is to run all signed letters to the editor in a timely manner with as little editing as possible. We ask that letters be typed, neatly printed, or emailed, and that writers be brief, making their points concisely.
Only the name and hometown of letter writers will be published in the newspaper. However, submissions must include the author’s name (typed or printed), signature (written submissions), address and telephone numbers.
We reserve the right to reject any copy or letters, but will do so only on rare occasions, typically when what is written prompts legal or ethical concerns, or when the letter is unusually lengthy. In some cases, however, we will contact writers to suggest changes that could make their letters acceptable for print.
Your opinion counts! Please write to: Letters to the Editor, The Standard-Journal 21 Arch St., Milton, PA 17847 or email email@example.com.